Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167420)

Let me know early hor dun last minute, cos normally we will go HH on sat, dowan end up room too small cos too many ppl

Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167385)

Thats bad, means the VBs at HMB got no biz liao

Originally Posted by jackbl (Post 11166782)

Those 90% is rubbish to you! Too basic.....

Originally Posted by Hurricane88 (Post 11161182)

tell me the name and passport number...I sure write in to ask ICA to explain why ICA allowed such things

Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167366)

If you are toking about the personal guarantor letter, which I had already taught KT many years back, this method is already beaten to death by too many usage/abuses.....

Each entry is always evaluated on its own merits depending on how ICA deems the person to be an "undesirable" or not...

Originally Posted by FireShark (Post 11162941)

the Customs officer need my friend to sign a document at the airport like certifying her that she come her as tourist not working. After that 1 time, her vb come her very easily le.

Originally Posted by jackbl (Post 11166786)

Not affecting me.... never been there before :D :p

Originally Posted by jackbl (Post 11166795)

Singaporean mentality... others have I also must have

Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167257)

Then u be damn disappointed cos the ones we frequent are the tame tame ones cos we hate aggressive Vbs

Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167366)

Bro, sorry to burst your bubble but there are no such "guarantee of good conduct" documents for signing at immigration for normal entry pass, unless you are tokking about the sponsorship form which I am aware of is only applicable if u are extending the stay for the VB or applying for other types of passes/visa.


Cheerios......SS08 ^_^

Originally Posted by KangTuo (Post 11167700)

base on merit, number 2 CMI...
1st time in sillypore, she extended 2 mths stay (U-turn). Went back for 5 weeks then come back again for 1 mth. Went back for 1.5 mth then came back for 1 mth (online extension unsuccessful). Went back 3 weeks and try come back again but refused entry. Within the few times she came, she used 3 different addresses and changed 3 passport. :eek: which I think this is one big reason for being considered undesirable tourist.

Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167366)

Bro, sorry to burst your bubble but there are no such "guarantee of good conduct" documents for signing at immigration for normal entry pass, unless you are tokking about the sponsorship form which I am aware of is only applicable if u are extending the stay for the VB or applying for other types of passes/visa.

If you are toking about the personal guarantor letter, which I had already taught KT many years back, this method is already beaten to death by too many usage/abuses by all those VBs spreading this method around all these years. I remembered there was 1 superhero here in SBF that posted the whole template of that letter to "educate" the whole world, so in the end this method is already overused until ICA see until sian already :eek:

The visa-free 30 days is not a regulation, its simply a guideline for Asean countries and not all follows e.g. Myanmar. Even Sinkapor does not fixed this number of days and each case will be evaluated on its own merits, e.g. the VB that I sat with 2 weeks ago at W had only a 7 days entry pass, and she went to JB turn-around to renew the pass cos she tot can get 30 days this time round but again she kena 7 days entry pass again.

Each entry is always evaluated on its own merits depending on how ICA deems the person to be an "undesirable" or not, so entry into Sinkapor is not even guaranteed not to talk about the number of days, and they are not even obliged to provide you with the reason for refusing entry or restricting the number of days. There are many here that thought they can escort their VB through customs by travelling with them, but end up the VB got called into the ICA room and the escort are not even allowed to go in or even wait at the corridor, not to talk about giving them a chance to argue with the ICA on the regulations ;)

Haiz......I think I may have said toooo much on this already :o dun think too much on this okay, just a gentlemenly healthy debate on TCSS :D

Cheerios......SS08 ^_^

Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167389)

Dun bluff lah, u have been to almost everyhere in Sinkapor that have VBs :eek: some say JB or even batam :D

Cheerios.....SS08 ^_^

Originally Posted by Hurricane88 (Post 11167962)

..i am sure she used 3 diff names on 3 diff passports...she

Originally Posted by Hurricane88 (Post 11168002)

these I also agreed...so far this jackbl only want to know but hardly share his lobang with us...:p

Originally Posted by snipeshot08 (Post 11167366)

Bro, sorry to burst your bubble but there are no such "guarantee of good conduct" documents for signing at immigration for normal entry pass, unless you are tokking about the sponsorship form which I am aware of is only applicable if u are extending the stay for the VB or applying for other types of passes/visa.

If you are toking about the personal guarantor letter, which I had already taught KT many years back, this method is already beaten to death by too many usage/abuses by all those VBs spreading this method around all these years. I remembered there was 1 superhero here in SBF that posted the whole template of that letter to "educate" the whole world, so in the end this method is already overused until ICA see until sian already :eek:

The visa-free 30 days is not a regulation, its simply a guideline for Asean countries and not all follows e.g. Myanmar. Even Sinkapor does not fixed this number of days and each case will be evaluated on its own merits, e.g. the VB that I sat with 2 weeks ago at W had only a 7 days entry pass, and she went to JB turn-around to renew the pass cos she tot can get 30 days this time round but again she kena 7 days entry pass again.

Each entry is always evaluated on its own merits depending on how ICA deems the person to be an "undesirable" or not, so entry into Sinkapor is not even guaranteed not to talk about the number of days, and they are not even obliged to provide you with the reason for refusing entry or restricting the number of days. There are many here that thought they can escort their VB through customs by travelling with them, but end up the VB got called into the ICA room and the escort are not even allowed to go in or even wait at the corridor, not to talk about giving them a chance to argue with the ICA on the regulations ;)

Haiz......I think I may have said toooo much on this already :o dun think too much on this okay, just a gentlemenly healthy debate on TCSS :D

Cheerios......SS08 ^_^