samunouno |
13-04-2022 04:00 PM |
Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kopiosteve
(Post 21216901)
On the contrary bro.
FN = DEFINITELY higher playability from 99.9% of the FN MLs. It usually means full access for my hands and mouth.
However, "fngering", or some guys like to refer to as "digging" is another matter. It's not so much the girl doesn't permit it, they are usually afraid to let guys do it. Why? Cos the vagina is a sensitive organ, lined with thin delicate tissues that can be injured or infected rather easily. Many guys have jagged fingernails that can very easily lacerate the inner walls. And let's not even talk about the hygiene of what these fingers were touching before they start to "dig". Plus, many guys don't know how to do it. By the mere token that the word "digging" is used shows it is done roughly and without proficiency.
|
Ok, better listen to bro @ Kopiosteve regarding FN and playability. I actually read a lot of his posts here for a long time and he drops tit bits of knowledge here and there, and over time I've accumulated a fair bit of knowledge about MLs from him and a few other lao jiao bros.
I'd say my experience is more limited and based on the number of ladies I've tried so far. even the SN/vanilla ones were very playable for me because I chose the right ladies (from reading this thread). These high playability SN MLs are actually not a lot lower in playability when compared to the FN ones I've had. Only diff is panty on (play with the pussy directly VS only touch downstairs from outside the panty). But have to note that many of the other vanilla/SN MLs are much more limited in playability. There was a recent topic about some SN MLs even wearing pants (not panty) for the session. There was a running list, if you check back, from the bro above for these pants on MLs. I totally avoided those.
|