View Single Post
  #11209  
Old 07-01-2016, 04:20 PM
Wendella Wendella is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 783
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 467 / Power: 17
Wendella is a glorious beacon of lightWendella is a glorious beacon of lightWendella is a glorious beacon of lightWendella is a glorious beacon of lightWendella is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Vietnam - HCM (Thread 3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomMAffolter View Post
for a guy that pro sharing i see very little sharing on your part.... i see lots of spoonfeeding to lazy guys who ask questions or cant be bothered reading the thread ...sure you repeat things other guys have reported and shared initially ...i means lets look at the website thing that was shared prob two years ago in one form or another ...in that time u have fr zero girl...unless u include the one girl that is your reg love lust interest which u caveat that u cant wont share anyway...its amazing the whole legion of guys who are pro sharing want others to share when looking at their own post history there is zero tangible intel let alone new intel....so lets change that to u are pro spoonfeed and repeated old intel
I actually find the term "spoonfeeding" to be offensive. It implies that people who come here new are akin to little helpless babies who are completely dependent on their mommies to take care of them, in other words it belittles new people here. It's an emasculating term, like calling a man a faggot or a girl. In fact, it is not unmanly to have never visited Saigon before, nor to ask questions about it. I think there is a bit of a stupid macho ethic at play (amongst some here) that asking a question is not what a real man does.

Your point about the websites being reported 2 years ago is not too pertinent. Should we expect some guy coming here for a weekend for the first time to go back 2 years reading through all the stuff in this fascinating forum? Without subtopics, this thread just rolls and rolls, so info has to keep appearing or it is gone forever. When I posted my stuff about those websites, I was totally unaware that there was anything about those sites in here a couple years ago, or at any time previously. I found out about the websites a year ago (from none other than YOU in the other forum) and learned what I wrote in my posts mainly through my own experience.

Anyway, what I consider the most valuable type of "sharing" is the useful kind: someone can read it and then go out and find the girls and get laid. You seem to disagree and think there's another kind of post that is of more value. Fair enough. A good example of my kind of sharing is my set of posts from around Oct 25, where I wrote a how-to about the website girls. Some long detailed posts in that series, and anyone who reads it should be set to go meet those girls. You did some great posts about a month ago on the types and pricing of massage/hot toc places around town. I can see how the type of sharing I've done is less valuable to you personally since you already have a lot of experience with the website girls, you know how to find them and how to do it. I would guess that my type of sharing is something a large segment of guys coming here would find useful though.

It would be interesting if some here could go have a look at those posts I mention and say if they think those are good "sharing". Not to say "mine is better than yours" cuz your massage posts were classic. Seriously.

I also would be curious to hear what you yourself think is the best type of sharing. I won't speculate. Your turn.