Quote:
Originally Posted by MiG27
Well, not going to dispute what you have written.
Yes, many MLs could have gone on short changing customers n all that.
But, whether they are freely allowed to do that will depends on what the other MLs are offering.
The non JS MLs are fully aware of the existence of this JS group.
So, they know in order to pull in customers, they will need to offer the same type or at least something similar.
That is their motivating factor behind.
Which ML would want to remove their bra n panties n let customer touch here and there? If can get away with it, of course they will go this route.
But that said, I am constantly bewildered by the fact that MLs offering vanilla type of services can also command a steady pool of customers.
Not a good sign but....to each his own....I also cant comment much.  |
Actually, why not? If my memory serves me well, when this local massage thread was first started years back, it all began with this kind of so called “vanilla” services. And back then there were many gems already, and they were just providing massage with HJ. Semi nude for most of them, at most down to pantries no full nude. Fate was one of the earlier chio ones to go full monty and that girl was popular for quite a while.
That was about the standard back then, although the price is lower at ard 90-100 for most. But businesses for them was brisk already so means there is a market for this, all along, since long time ago.
Just that now we have been treated to more juicy more “open” type of services as it got more and more common (last time BJ was not that common, not to mention BBBJ) we tend to think that this is the norm, at that pricing.
Just shows that times have moved, but human desires still the same. Different people have different preferences.
I do enjoy the more intimacy now, although sometimes these “vanilla” type would as well as long as the other things that matter to the individual ticks - looks, figure, chemistry, environment etc. end of the day some guys are there not just for all these but also for the companionship.