Quote:
Originally Posted by =LatexDolly=
Next time you guys have a gathering, it's no trouble for me to drop by, toast a few glasses and sing some songs. 
Shook almost everyone's hands but yours.
I will be no obstruction to the activities of gentlemen. |
Hi Lady LD,
Good to see you logging into this forum after a hard night's work
'Obstruction'? Very unlikely given your professionalism. However, the more petinent issue is whether:
a) Will you be a facilitator/catalyst in a bro's carnal pursuit? (In pick-up parlance, be a "wingman".)
b) Will you be a collaborator/participant in such activities?
Take care & rest well sis ...
PS: Lady LD, just to up the 'fun' quotion a little ..... You do know that this is a 'loaded' comment-question don't ya? I can pretty much anticipate some 'standard' response such as:
a) Bros very experienced no need my help. (No commital answer with a subtle compliment thrown in)
b) I am not desirable vis-a-vis the sweet mei-mei. (Polite brush off, yet a non commital answer in essence)
c) You think I #@&^ 'kway' (hokkien for 'chicken') is it? (The aggro tongue in cheek reply - in essence still sitting on a fence but using verbal aggression to evade the issue)
d) Dam stress kena psycho analysed like this. (Calling to attention on the issue but in essence still circumventing the issue)
e) Can I don't answer? / For you to find out
(Outright avoidance. the latter has some element of flirtation thrown in)
f) Non sequitur - Latin for "it does not follow" - kind of response (akin to Stephen Chow's "mo let to"). (Again its avoiding the issue at hand).
